Authors:
PhD Peter Achten | INNAS | Netherlands
Sjoerd Eggenkamp | INNAS BV | Netherlands
Jeroen Potma | INNAS BV | Netherlands
The rotational speed of slipper type, axial piston pumps and motors is limited. One of the most important reasons
for this limitation is the barrel tipping torque, which is (amongst others) affected by the centrifugal forces of the
pistons. The force of the barrel spring is needed to overcome the tipping of the barrel, and thus preventing the
malfunction of the pump or motor. The hydrostatic pressure can create an additional hydrostatic force, pushing
the barrel to the port plate, and thereby preventing the barrel to tip. But, at low operating pressures, the
hydrostatic force is insufficient, and the tipping torque can only be counteracted by the central barrel spring. Due
to the limited strength of this spring, the barrel will tip above a certain operating speed. At that point, the face
seal of the barrel will no longer make a full contact with the port plate, and the pump or motor cannot any longer
be operated, due to excessive leakage and wear.
Floating cup (FC) pumps and motors have the advantage that the pistons are press-fitted into the central rotor.
Therefore, the pistons can’t create anymore any tipping torque load on the barrel. But, unlike in conventional
axial piston designs, in FC-machines, the cylinders are no longer integrated and machined inside the cylinder
block or barrel. Instead, they are separated and have become cup-like cylinders which are floating on, and
supported by the remaining barrel plate. Being isolated from the barrel itself, these ‘cups’ will create another
tipping torque load on the barrel. The weight of the cups is however small, much smaller than the weight of the
pistons in an equally sized slipper type machine. Furthermore, the centrifugal tipping torque is reduced by the
short cup-stroke in the floating cup machine.
Nevertheless, it is desirable to further reduce the mass of the cups, not only to increase the maximum operating
speed, but also to reduce the force of the central barrel spring, which would further increase the overall
efficiency. The best way to reduce the mass of the cups, is by means of a reduction of the wall thickness of the
cups. It needs to be considered that the cups expand when being pressurized. Therefore, in order to maintain a
tight sealing between the cups and the pistons, the piston crown needs to expand as well, thereby following the
radial expansion of the cup. Consequently, the wall thickness of the piston crown needs to be reduced as well.
The question is whether these conditions can be met when the wall thickness of the piston crown and cup wall is
reduced. In this paper, the effects of a 50% reduction of the wall thickness are investigated and described. The
deformation is calculated by means of FEM analysis of the piston and the cup.